Saturday, December 15, 2012

The Fight

I know a lot of what I write and tweet about the NHL lockout might be doom and gloom scenarios. For the most part, that is how I choose to see things. I was hopeful for a long time that a deal could get done, but we're here on December 15 and there is no CBA.

And as much as it looks like (hopefully not just from me) that Don Fehr and Gary Bettman are the bad guys here, they are both people representing groups of people that are fighting for things that (I hope) they believe in, and they are fully within their rights to do so (both to believe in certain things like a salary cap, contract limits, travel expenses, and to be able to fight for them).

But both sides are being asinine, stubborn, and stupid here. Taking a hard stance and hoping the other side rolls over is a foolish viewpoint. But then again, being the side that rolls over is also foolish. Both sides need to be willing to compromise (I may be wrong, but it seems that the players have been more willing to do this than the owners) in order for it to work. Otherwise, it's going to be a stare-down.

I have my own opinions on who's right and who's wrong in what they're asking for. I'll save them for another post (and I think I've shared a few already). This gripe isn't about that anymore. Unfortunately, this don't-back-down mentality is something that's invaded our culture in America a bit too much. Look at the U.S. Congress (I promise I won't get into politics here). They're doing almost the same thing, but instead of playing with the collective money of a relatively small group (professional hockey players), they're playing with the money of an entire nation. Even business and other forms of government leadership has taken this stance, and all it creates is problems. From these analogies, I don't know which is the chicken and which is the egg, but it's all poison.

The NHL owners and players can go out and set an example for everyone that you can be successful even though you don't get everything that you want, even taking/accepting things that you don't want. But they both have to be willing to do that. If one side bargains while the other side sits firm, that's not going to solve anything, but it might bring the NHL back into NHL arenas sooner rather than later...only to go through this again in 6, 7, 8, or however many years.


Leave a comment or drop me a line at DyHrdMET [at] gmail [dot] com. Your comments will fall into a moderation queue.

Comments (2)

Loading... Logging you in...
  • Logged in as
Login or signup now to comment.
Well. I can't stand either one of them (Bettman and Fehr). Bettman has tried to expand hockey into markets that have no reason to have it and failed. He moved teams out of hockey hotbeds and into the desert. I understand what he was trying to do, but he needs to concede and get teams back in Canada and then resign.

Fehr screwed up baseball in 1994 and is determined to do the same thing to hockey now.

It would be nice to think that both sides are working to a common goal but I just don't see that happening.

As I have mentioned before a decision needs to be made NOW. At this point I don't care either way.
Reply
1 reply · active 643 weeks ago
I'd love to see the NHL return in January. But I'd hate to think that something wasn't settled here and will be taken up next time (assuming I still care about it next time). Bettman has done at least one good thing for the league (which I can't think of what it is), but he's done a lot of bad too. I said in the beginning that with Bettman's 2 other lockouts and Fehr's player strike, that this wasn't going to end well, and it looks like I might be right.

I don't understand how baseball has had labor peace since 1995 without either side getting greedy about taking a bigger piece of the pie.
Reply

Comments by